Skoda Superb III
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSIvsTesla Model S · Facelift 2016 60D 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model S · Facelift 2016
60D 60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60D 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Most powerful328 hp245 kW
- Highest torque525 Nm387 lb-ft
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight181 hp/t135 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 328hp245kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 525Nm387lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 2,108kg4,647lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 2,600kg5,732lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 103.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | - |
| Length | 4,861mm191in | 4,979mm196in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,964mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,662mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,700mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 148mm6in | 160mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,645L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | 328 hp 245 kW |
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60D 60 kWh has 48 hp more than Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI and Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60D 60 kWh: 48 hp (36 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | 525 Nm 387 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | 2,108 kg 4,647 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 5.8 s |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60D 60 kWh and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI | TeslaModel SFacelift 201660D 60 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 328 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 525 Nm 387 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 2,108 kg 4,647 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
- Is 558 kg lighter
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Tesla Model S Facelift 2016 60D 60 kWh
- Has 48 hp more
- Has 175 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























