Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2017-2018
VS

Skoda Superb III

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Lightest
    1,550 kg
    3,417 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    181 hp/t
    135 kW/t
    5.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.9 L/100 km
    26.4 mpg US
    31.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    930 km
    578 mi
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best overall score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    280 hp
    209 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    63/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
280hp209kW
280hp209kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,641kg3,618lb
1,550kg3,417lb
Gross weight
2,240kg4,938lb
2,230kg4,916lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
96.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
103.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
22.7s
Calculated
23.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
904km562mi
Calculated
930km578mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,861mm191in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,837mm112in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,581mm62in
1,574mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
148mm6in
Trunk volume
563L
625L
Max trunk volume-
1,760L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions-
160g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5,100-6,500 rpm1,700-5,600 rpm6,750 rpm
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI5,600-6,500 rpm1,700-5,600 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.7 s
23.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.9 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.6 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
102 mph
161 km/h
100 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
1,550 kg
3,417 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI5.6 s
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI5.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
904 km
562 mi
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
930 km
578 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.6 s
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSISkodaSuperb III2.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,641 kg
3,618 lb
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
904 km
562 mi
930 km
578 mi
CO2 score
-
160 g/km
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
171 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
181 hp/t
135 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI

  • Is 91 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)3.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
50 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)50 TDI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201950 TDI V6
2.0 TSI
60 60 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel SFacelift 201660 60 kWh
2.0 TSI
70 70 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
2.0 TSI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsAUDIS5 Sportback (8T)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
2.0 TSI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TFSI V6
2.0 TSI
2.0 BiTDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
50 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202350 TDI V6
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Superb III 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster