Car comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023
VS

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,533 km
    953 mi
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,682kg3,708lb
1,525kg3,362lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,130kg4,696lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
To 99% top speed
137.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
125.2s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
37.8s
Calculated
37.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,533km953mi
Calculated
1,031km641mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,869mm192in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,581mm62in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
138mm5in
Trunk volume
625L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
66L
CO2 emissions
118g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.8 s
37.2 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,525 kg
3,362 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
243 km/h
151 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
239 km/h
149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI has more power, Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,533 km
953 mi
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1,031 km
641 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
239 km/h
149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
239 km/h
149 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.7 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
239 km/h
149 mph
Lightness
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
1,525 kg
3,362 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
1,533 km
953 mi
1,031 km
641 mi
CO2 score
118 g/km
-
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
125 hp/t
93 kW/t
8.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 502 km (312 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI

  • Is 157 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI vs Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster