Car comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023
VS

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)

EQS 350 100 kWh

292 hpElectricRWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2022

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    292 hp
    218 kW
  • Highest torque
    565 Nm
    417 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
200hp149kW
292hp218kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
565Nm417lb-ft
Curb weight
1,682kg3,708lb
2,315kg5,104lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,910kg6,415lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
137.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
92.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
37.8s
Calculated
39.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,533km953mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
-
Length
4,869mm192in
5,216mm205in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,926mm76in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,512mm60in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
3,210mm126in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,667mm66in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,682mm66in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
134mm5in
Trunk volume
625L
610L
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,770L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
-
CO2 emissions
118g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.8 s
39.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
149 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh has 92 hp more than Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh: 92 hp (69 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
565 Nm
417 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2,315 kg
5,104 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
243 km/h
151 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 1.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
292 hp
218 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
292 hp
218 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
Power
200 hp
149 kW
292 hp
218 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
565 Nm
417 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
6.6 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
2,315 kg
5,104 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
5,216 mm
205.4 in
Height
1,512 mm
59.5 in
Range score
1,533 km
953 mi
-
CO2 score
118 g/km
-
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Is 633 kg lighter
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh

  • Has 92 hp more
  • Has 165 Nm more
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI vs Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 350 100 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster