Car comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023
VS

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2020-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    118 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,533 km
    953 mi
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,682kg3,708lb
1,649kg3,635lb
Gross weight
2,080kg4,586lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
137.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
117.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
37.8s
Calculated
37.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,533km953mi
Calculated
1,294km804mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,869mm192in
4,866mm192in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,469mm58in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
-
Rear track
1,572mm62in
-
Ground clearance
139mm5in
-
Trunk volume
625L
-
Max trunk volume
1,760L
1,557L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
66L
CO2 emissions
118g/km
134g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI-1,750-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.8 s
37.6 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
146 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,649 kg
3,635 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
243 km/h
151 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
234 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI7.9 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
1,533 km
953 mi
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
1,294 km
804 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.9 s
243 km/h
151 mph
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.4 s
234 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
234 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
1,649 kg
3,635 lb
Fuel consumption
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,869 mm
191.7 in
Height
1,469 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
1,533 km
953 mi
1,294 km
804 mi
CO2 score
118 g/km
134 g/km
Trunk score
625 L
22.1 cu ft
1,557 L
55.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.88 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.67 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used675 L178 US gal148 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,181 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI

  • Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 239 km (149 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI

  • Is 33 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 932 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TDI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TDI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI vs Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster