Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Skoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,514 kg3,338 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t94 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,514kg3,338lb | 1,541kg3,397lb |
| Gross weight | 2,162kg4,766lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 136.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.9s Calculated | 38.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,500km932mi Calculated | 1,119km695mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,869mm192in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,469mm58in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,836mm112in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | 1,583mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 625L | 563L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,760L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 167g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.9 s | 38.6 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,514 kg 3,338 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,500 km 932 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,514 kg 3,338 lb | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,500 km 932 mi | 1,119 km 695 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 167 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.70 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,155 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 27 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 381 km (237 mi) more estimated range
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Emits 32 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























