AUDI A7 Sportback (C8)
Car comparison
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDIvsSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III · Facelift 2019
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,514 kg3,338 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t94 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,500 km932 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score85/100
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions127 g/km
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,514kg3,338lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,162kg4,766lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 144.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 136.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.9s Calculated | 39.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,286km799mi Calculated | 1,500km932mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,969mm196in | 4,869mm192in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,469mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,926mm115in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,651mm65in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 535L | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | 167g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 3,750-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.9 s | 39.9 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI has 14 hp more than Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,514 kg 3,338 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 8.3 s |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI and AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 1,286 km 799 mi |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 1,500 km 932 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.3 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI | SkodaSuperb IIIFacelift 20192.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,514 kg 3,338 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,286 km 799 mi | 1,500 km 932 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | 167 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 535 L 18.9 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI | Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A7 Sportback (C8) 40 TDI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Facelift 2019 2.0 TDI
- Is 186 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 214 km (133 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























