Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,467 km911 mi
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,541kg3,397lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,146kg4,731lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 137.7s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 43.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,119km695mi Calculated | 1,467km911mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,861mm191in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,836mm112in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 135g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 43.3 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 1,467 km 911 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.3 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb III2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,541 kg 3,397 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,119 km 695 mi | 1,467 km 911 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 135 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 31 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 348 km (216 mi) more estimated range
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























