Car comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb III 1.8 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2021-2023
VS

Skoda Superb III

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedLiftback / fastback2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,119 km
    695 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI

  • Lightest
    1,410 kg
    3,109 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    95 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    134 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    625 L
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,541kg3,397lb
1,410kg3,109lb
Gross weight
2,160kg4,762lb
2,035kg4,486lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
To 99% top speed
125.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
128.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.1s
0-200 km/h
38.6s
Calculated
42.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,119km695mi
Calculated
1,119km695mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,798cc110cu in
Length
4,866mm192in
4,861mm191in
Width
1,871mm74in
1,864mm73in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,468mm58in
Wheelbase
2,836mm112in
2,841mm112in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,584mm62in
Rear track
1,583mm62in
1,572mm62in
Ground clearance
138mm5in
149mm6in
Trunk volume
563L
625L
Max trunk volume
1,557L
1,760L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions
135g/km
134g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III 1.8 TSIPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.6 s
42.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,541 kg
3,397 lb
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
1,410 kg
3,109 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
237 km/h
147 mph
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
232 km/h
144 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI7.9 s
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI8.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1,119 km
695 mi
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
1,119 km
695 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
8.1 s
232 km/h
144 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.9 s
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSISkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.1 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
232 km/h
144 mph
Lightness
1,541 kg
3,397 lb
1,410 kg
3,109 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,866 mm
191.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Length
4,861 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Range score
1,119 km
695 mi
1,119 km
695 mi
CO2 score
135 g/km
134 g/km
Trunk score
563 L
19.9 cu ft
625 L
22.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
128 hp/t
95 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSISkoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI

  • Is 131 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 62 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 1 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TSI
Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
1.8 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20143.0 TDI V6 ultra
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201940 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202340 TDI
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIA5L Sportback (B10)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
EQS 350 100 kWh
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 350 100 kWh
1.8 TSI
3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
VS
SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6 clean diesel
2.0 TSI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSIvsAUDIS7 Sportback (C8)3.0 TDI V6
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI vs Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster