Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk625 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,576kg3,474lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,035kg4,486lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 133.1s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 128.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.6s Calculated | 42.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 177Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 1,119km695mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,861mm191in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 149mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 625L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,760L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.6 s | 42.3 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 1,119 km 695 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.1 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb III1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,576 kg 3,474 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 1,119 km 695 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 625 L 22.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI | Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 286 km (177 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 12 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III 1.8 TSI
- Is 166 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 62 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























