Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb II
3.6 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,656 kg3,651 lb
- Best power-to-weight169 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range930 km578 mi
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score88/100
Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6
- Largest trunk595 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,656kg3,651lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 2,285kg5,038lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 93.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 122.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s Calculated | 27.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 169hp/t126kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 930km578mi Calculated | 588km366mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,518mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 595L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5,100-6,500 rpm | 2,000-4,900 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 27.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI has 20 hp more than Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6 and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 1,656 kg 3,651 lb |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 5.5 s |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI and Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6: 3.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 930 km 578 mi |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 588 km 366 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TSI | SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,656 kg 3,651 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 930 km 578 mi | 588 km 366 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 595 L 21.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 169 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI | Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 341 km (212 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 32 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























