Car comparison

Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb II

3.6 FSI V6

260 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedLiftback / fastback2008-2013
VS

Volkswagen Arteon

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboLiftback / fastback2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Lightest
    1,665 kg
    3,671 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    156 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    595 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,119 km
    695 mi
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Power
260hp194kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,828kg4,030lb
Gross weight
2,285kg5,038lb
2,360kg5,203lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
122.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
113.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
27.5s
Calculated
30.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.9L/100 km15.8mpg US19.0mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
131hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
588km366mi
Calculated
1,119km695mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,597cc220cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,838mm190in
4,862mm191in
Width
1,817mm72in
1,871mm74in
Height
1,462mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,761mm109in
2,837mm112in
Front track
1,545mm61in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,518mm60in
1,581mm62in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
138mm5in
Trunk volume
595L
563L
Max trunk volume
1,700L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions-
152g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDIPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V66,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.5 s
30.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW

Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6 has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
1,828 kg
4,030 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V66.5 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI6.5 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6: 4.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
588 km
366 mi
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
1,119 km
695 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDI
Power
260 hp
194 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,828 kg
4,030 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
595 L
21.0 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,462 mm
57.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
588 km
366 mi
1,119 km
695 mi
CO2 score
-
152 g/km
Trunk score
595 L
21.0 cu ft
563 L
19.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 163 kg lighter
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 32 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 530 km (330 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 FSI V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)3.0 TDI V6
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI
3.6 FSI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIA7 Sportback (C7)Facelift 20142.0 TFSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenArteon Shooting BrakeFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)2.0 TFSI
2.0 BiTDI
45 TFSI
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)45 TFSI
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIS5 Sportback (8T)3.0 TFSI V6
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIS5 Sportback (8T)Facelift 20113.0 TFSI V6
2.0 BiTDI
45 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIA5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 201945 TDI V6
3.6 FSI V6
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenArteon2.0 TSI
2.0 BiTDI
45 TDI V6
VS
VolkswagenArteon2.0 BiTDIvsAUDIA7 Sportback (C8)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
3.6 FSI V6
70 70 kWh
VS
SkodaSuperb II3.6 FSI V6vsTeslaModel S70 70 kWh
Skoda Superb II 3.6 FSI V6 vs Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 BiTDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster