Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,404 km873 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,573kg3,468lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,193kg4,835lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 125.5s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 128.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.6s Calculated | 39.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,404km873mi Calculated | 759km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,817mm72in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,518mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,557L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.6 s | 39.5 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,573 kg 3,468 lb |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,404 km 873 mi |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 759 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,573 kg 3,468 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,404 km 873 mi | 759 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI | Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 645 km (401 mi) more estimated range
- Has 967 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
- Is 18 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























