Skoda Superb II
Car comparison
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Arteon · Facelift 2020
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Largest trunk1,557 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,649kg3,635lb |
| Gross weight | 2,193kg4,835lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 128.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 117.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 39.5s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km472mi Calculated | 1,294km804mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,838mm190in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,871mm74in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,761mm109in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,518mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 590L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,557L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | - | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 39.5 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 146 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI and Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 759 km 472 mi |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenArteonFacelift 20202.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 472 mi | 1,294 km 804 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 1,557 L 55.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb II 2.0 TSI
- Is 94 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Arteon Facelift 2020 2.0 TDI
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 535 km (332 mi) more estimated range
- Has 967 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























