Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Scout
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t95 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,489 kg3,283 lb
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,489kg3,283lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,150kg4,740lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 64.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.5s Calculated | 28.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 128hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 904km562mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,773mm188in | 4,703mm185in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,516mm60in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,786mm110in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,572mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,780L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.5 s | 28.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 1,489 kg 3,283 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TSI | SkodaOctavia IV Scout2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,489 kg 3,283 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 904 km 562 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 128 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI
- Is 78 kg lighter
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Skoda Octavia IV Scout 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























