Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant · Facelift 2024 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV Combi
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed223 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,452 kg3,201 lb
- Best power-to-weight103 hp/t77 kW/t9.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,216 km756 mi
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best economy score97/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,452kg3,201lb | 1,602kg3,532lb |
| Gross weight | 2,060kg4,542lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 82.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.1s Calculated | 38.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,216km756mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,631mm182in | 4,689mm185in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,487mm59in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,519mm60in | 1,535mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 142mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 611L | 640L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,642L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | - | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,700-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.1 s | 38.8 s |
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 92 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 1,452 kg 3,201 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 8.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 1,216 km 756 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.4 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
| 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VIII VariantFacelift 20242.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 223 km/h 139 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,452 kg 3,201 lb | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,216 km 756 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 611 L 21.6 cu ft | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 6.48 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 10.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 555 L147 US gal122 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 971.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VIII Variant Facelift 2024 2.0 TDI
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 175 km (108 mi) more estimated range
- Has 29 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























