Skoda Octavia IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDIvsBMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Touring (G21)
318i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,216 km756 mi
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score97/100
- Best practicality score89/100
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight99 hp/t74 kW/t10.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,602kg3,532lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,135kg4,707lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 78.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 38.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 159Nm/t107lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,216km756mi Calculated | 952km591mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,709mm185in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,827mm72in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 2,851mm112in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,588mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 142mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 640L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 59L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,700-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,300-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 38.8 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 156 hp 116 kW |
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI and BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i and Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI and BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 1,216 km 756 mi |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 952 km 591 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
| 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,216 km 756 mi | 952 km 591 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI | BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.48 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.42 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 555 L147 US gal122 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 971.25 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 265 km (164 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318i
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 32 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























