Skoda Octavia IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDIvsBMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 3 Series Touring (G21)
318d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.8 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,602 kg3,532 lb
- Best power-to-weight94 hp/t70 kW/t10.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.4 L/100 km69.2 mpg US83.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,216 km756 mi
- Largest trunk640 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best economy score97/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,602kg3,532lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 80.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.8s Calculated | 42.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t42hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,216km756mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,709mm185in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,827mm72in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 2,851mm112in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,579mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,535mm60in | 1,569mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 142mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 640L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,700-2,750 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.8 s | 42.1 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 8.8 s |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI and BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI and BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318d: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 1,216 km 756 mi |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.8 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI |
| 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK |
| BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IV Combi2.0 TDI | BMW3 Series Touring (G21)318d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,602 kg 3,532 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.7 L/100 km 63.6 mpg US 76.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,216 km 756 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 640 L 22.6 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.7 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI | BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.48 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.42 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 555 L147 US gal122 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 971.25 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia IV Combi 2.0 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 383 km (238 mi) more estimated range
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW 3 Series Touring (G21) 318d
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























