Volkswagen Arteon
Car comparison
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia IV · Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia IV · Facelift 2024
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,583 kg3,490 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk600 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,583kg3,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 127.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 93.2s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.9s Calculated | 34.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | 775km481mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,862mm191in | 4,698mm185in |
| Width | 1,871mm74in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,837mm112in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,581mm62in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 563L | 600L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,555L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.9 s | 34.2 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI has 14 hp more than Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI and Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 1,294 km 804 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 775 km 481 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenArteon2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia IVFacelift 20242.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,583 kg 3,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | 775 km 481 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 563 L 19.9 cu ft | 600 L 21.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Arteon 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 519 km (323 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia IV Facelift 2024 2.0 TSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























