Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Polo VI
GTI 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t126 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 1,907kg4,204lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.1s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 75.2s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.9s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 678km421mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,067mm160in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,751mm69in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,549mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,496mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 305L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 1,079L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 4,390-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,350 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.9 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 678 km 421 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 678 km 421 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 285 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























