Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017

RS 2.0 TSI

230 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedHatchback2017-2018
VS

Mini Hatch (F56)

JCW 2.0

231 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    249 km/h
    155 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    769 km
    478 mi
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Most powerful
    231 hp
    172 kW
  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    192 hp/t
    143 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    59/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIMiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
Power
230hp172kW
231hp172kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,365kg3,009lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
1,907kg4,204lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
80.1s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
68.5s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
6.3s
0-200 km/h
24.9s
Calculated
22.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
769km478mi
Calculated
657km408mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,689mm185in
3,874mm153in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,727mm68in
Height
1,448mm57in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,495mm98in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,485mm58in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,485mm58in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
143mm6in
Trunk volume
590L
211L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
-
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
50L
44L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIMini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI4,700-6,200 rpm1,500-4,600 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.05,200-6,000 rpm1,250-4,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIMiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
6.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.9 s
22.7 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
12.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
165 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
230 hp
172 kW
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW

Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 has 1 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
249 km/h
155 mph
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
246 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI6.8 s
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.06.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
168 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
769 km
478 mi
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
657 km
408 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
230 hp
172 kW
6.8 s
249 km/h
155 mph
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
6.3 s
246 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,874 mm
152.5 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
Power
230 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.8 s
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
6.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI
168 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIMiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
Power
230 hp
172 kW
231 hp
172 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
6.3 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,689 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,448 mm
57.0 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,874 mm
152.5 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
769 km
478 mi
657 km
408 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
155 g/km
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
168 hp/t
126 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIMini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 379 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 160 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)Facelift 2017GTI 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
JCW 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018JCW 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
N 2.0 T-GDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsHyundaii30 IIIN 2.0 T-GDI
JCW 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
JCW 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021JCW 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
GTI Performance 2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)Facelift 2017GTI Performance 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0vsMiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsMiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0
JCW 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSIvsAUDIS1 Sportback2.0 TFSI
JCW 2.0
JCW 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0vsMiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI vs Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster