Skoda Octavia III
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,365 kg3,009 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,365kg3,009lb | 1,376kg3,034lb |
| Gross weight | 1,907kg4,204lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,288mm169in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,449mm57in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,524mm99in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,581mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 905L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,376 kg 3,034 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 781 km 485 mi |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.9 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,365 kg 3,009 lb | 1,376 kg 3,034 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Is 11 kg lighter
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























