Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIvsMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III

RS 2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedHatchback2013-2017
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

JCW 1.6

218 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    220 hp
    164 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,365 kg
    3,009 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.1 L/100 km
    29.0 mpg US
    34.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    781 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIMiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
220hp164kW
218hp163kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,365kg3,009lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
1,907kg4,204lb
1,890kg4,167lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
78.8s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
26.1s
Calculated
32.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
781km485mi
Calculated
627km389mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,124mm162in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,449mm57in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,596mm102in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,527mm60in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,554mm61in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
128mm5in
Trunk volume
590L
330L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
1,080L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
50L
47L
CO2 emissions
149g/km
175g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.66,000 rpm2,100-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIMiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.1 s
32.1 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
218 hp
163 kW

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI has 2 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
245 km/h
152 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
226 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI6.9 s
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.66.8 s

Although Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI has more power, Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
781 km
485 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
627 km
389 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
6.9 s
245 km/h
152 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
218 hp
163 kW
6.8 s
226 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,449 mm
57.0 in
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,124 mm
162.4 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
218 hp
163 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.9 s
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIMiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
Power
220 hp
164 kW
218 hp
163 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
6.8 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
226 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,365 kg
3,009 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,449 mm
57.0 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,124 mm
162.4 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
781 km
485 mi
627 km
389 mi
CO2 score
149 g/km
175 g/km
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 155 km (96 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 260 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 26 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TSI
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)GTI 2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTI 2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)JCW 1.6
RS 2.0 TSI
JCW 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsMiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6
JCW 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
A 250
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzA-class (W176)Facelift 2015A 250
JCW 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TSI
B 250
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W246)Facelift 2014B 250
RS 2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI vs Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster