Skoda Octavia III
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Beetle (A5)
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best estimated range846 km526 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,912kg4,215lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.3s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 29.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 806km501mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,278mm168in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,449mm57in | 1,486mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,537mm100in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,544mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 128mm5in | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 905L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 142g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 29.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 155 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 806 km 501 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 142 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 27 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 280 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 40 km (25 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























