AUDI S1
Car comparison
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSIvsSkoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III
RS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions142 g/km
- Best estimated range806 km501 mi
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score82/100
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight176 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS12.0 TFSI | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,370kg3,020lb |
| Gross weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,912kg4,215lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 84.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 23.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 634km394mi Calculated | 806km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,975mm156in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,417mm56in | 1,449mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,469mm97in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,474mm58in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,452mm57in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 128mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 860L | 1,580L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 166g/km | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS12.0 TFSI | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 23.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI has 1 hp more than Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI and AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 5.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI and AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 634 km 394 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 806 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS12.0 TFSI | SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 634 km 394 mi | 806 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 166 g/km | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI | Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TSI
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 173 km (107 mi) more estimated range
- Has 380 L more trunk volume
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























