AUDI S1
Car comparison
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A3 (8V) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight176 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score61/100
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range917 km570 mi
- Largest trunk325 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score65/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIS12.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.2s Calculated | 25.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 634km394mi Calculated | 917km570mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,975mm156in | 4,241mm167in |
| Width | 1,740mm69in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,417mm56in | 1,424mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,469mm97in | 2,602mm102in |
| Front track | 1,474mm58in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,452mm57in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 325L |
| Max trunk volume | 860L | 1,060L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 166g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIS12.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.2 s | 25.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI has 41 hp more than AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 5.8 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI and AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI and AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 634 km 394 mi |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 917 km 570 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 231 hp 172 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.1 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIS12.0 TFSI | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIS12.0 TFSI | AUDIA3 (8V)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 634 km 394 mi | 917 km 570 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 166 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 325 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI | AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI S1 2.0 TFSI
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI A3 (8V) Facelift 2016 2.0 TFSI
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
- Emits 29 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























