Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Passat Variant (B8)
2.0 BiTDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions140 g/km
- Best estimated range1,222 km759 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 1,946kg4,290lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 59.6s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 22.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km450mi Calculated | 1,222km759mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,767mm188in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,568mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,780L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 140g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 22.6 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 6.3 s |
Although Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has more power, Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 725 km 450 mi |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 1,222 km 759 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 450 mi | 1,222 km 759 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 140 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 249 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Passat Variant (B8) 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 498 km (309 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























