Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,486 kg3,276 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions156 g/km
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,486kg3,276lb | 1,796kg3,960lb |
| Gross weight | 1,946kg4,290lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.8s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km450mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 156g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,200 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has 5 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 7.0 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 725 km 450 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.7 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 450 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 156 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI | Volvo V90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Has 5 hp more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























