Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,412 kg3,113 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,412kg3,113lb | 1,796kg3,960lb |
| Gross weight | 1,978kg4,361lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 781km485mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,685mm184in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,506mm59in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has 20 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 7.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 7.0 s |
Although Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 781 km 485 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | VolvoV902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 781 km 485 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI | Volvo V90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Is 384 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























