BMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
Car comparison
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525dvsSkoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi
RS 2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range1,294 km804 mi
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score93/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,412 kg3,113 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 230hp172kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,412kg3,113lb |
| Gross weight | 2,425kg5,346lb | 1,978kg4,361lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 68.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.9s Calculated | 24.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,294km804mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,942mm195in | 4,685mm184in |
| Width | 1,868mm74in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,975mm117in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,535mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,506mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 4,400 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.9 s | 24.0 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 231 hp 172 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d has 1 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 6.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d and Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 1,294 km 804 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)525d | SkodaOctavia III CombiRS 2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 230 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,412 kg 3,113 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,294 km 804 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d | Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 525d
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 513 km (319 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi RS 2.0 TSI
- Is 293 kg lighter
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























