Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V90 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019
VS

Volvo V90

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboWagon / estate2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,335 kg
    2,943 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Volvo V90 2.0 D4

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,170 km
    727 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIVolvoV902.0 D4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,335kg2,943lb
1,882kg4,149lb
Gross weight
1,920kg4,233lb
-
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
70.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
88.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
29.1s
Calculated
35.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
1,170km727mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,667mm184in
4,936mm194in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,879mm74in
Height
1,465mm58in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,686mm106in
2,941mm116in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
153mm6in
Trunk volume
610L
560L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,526L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
55L
CO2 emissions-
124g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIVolvo V90 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoV902.0 D44,250 rpm1,740-2,520 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIVolvoV902.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.1 s
35.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoV902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
VolvoV902.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
1,335 kg
2,943 lb
VolvoV902.0 D4
1,882 kg
4,149 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoV902.0 D4
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI7.4 s
VolvoV902.0 D48.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
VolvoV902.0 D4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
820 km
509 mi
VolvoV902.0 D4
1,170 km
727 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoV902.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,667 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
VolvoV902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
VolvoV902.0 D4
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 D4
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIVolvoV902.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
230 km/h143 mph
Restricted
220 km/h137 mph
Lightness
1,335 kg
2,943 lb
1,882 kg
4,149 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,667 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
1,170 km
727 mi
CO2 score
-
124 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
101 hp/t
75 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIVolvo V90 2.0 D4
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km8.23 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi13.24 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal705 L186 US gal155 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,234 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI

  • Is 547 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 50 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Volvo V90 2.0 D4

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 351 km (218 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TSI
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI
2.0 D4
20d
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TSI
2.0 D4
520d
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
CLA 220
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 220
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 D4
2.0 Blue dCi
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsRenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi
2.0 D4
320d
VS
VolvoV902.0 D4vsBMW3 Series Touring (G21)320d
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI vs Volvo V90 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster