Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,335 kg
    2,943 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    820 km
    509 mi
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,335kg2,943lb
1,385kg3,053lb
Gross weight
1,920kg4,233lb
1,920kg4,233lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
To 99% top speed
70.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
69.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
29.1s
Calculated
29.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
727km452mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,667mm184in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,465mm58in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,686mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,542mm61in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
141mm6in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
610L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
48L
CO2 emissions-
151g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.1 s
29.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
1,335 kg
2,943 lb
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
1,385 kg
3,053 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
228 km/h
142 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
820 km
509 mi
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
727 km
452 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.3 s
228 km/h
142 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,667 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
228 km/h
142 mph
Lightness
1,335 kg
2,943 lb
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,667 mm
183.7 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
727 km
452 mi
CO2 score
-
151 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
139 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km11.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi18.59 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal990 L262 US gal218 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,733 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 50 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI vs Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster