Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range820 km509 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,335kg2,943lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 69.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.1s Calculated | 29.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 202Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km509mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,667mm184in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 151g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.1 s | 29.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.3 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 509 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 151 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























