Renault Megane IV Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCevsSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful205 hp153 kW
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 205hp153kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,392kg3,069lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 1,924kg4,242lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 820km509mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,618cc99cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,626mm182in | 4,667mm184in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,712mm107in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 521L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,504L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe has 15 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 7.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 833 km 518 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 205 hp 153 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20172.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 205 hp 153 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,392 kg 3,069 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 820 km 509 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane IV Grandtour GT 1.6 Energy TCe
- Has 15 hp more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 57 kg lighter
- Has 89 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























