Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagen Golf VII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Golf VII Alltrack
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Volkswagen Golf VII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Best estimated range1,100 km684 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,410kg3,109lb | 1,584kg3,492lb |
| Gross weight | 2,048kg4,515lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.5s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 240Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,020km634mi Calculated | 1,100km684mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,659mm183in | 4,578mm180in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,463mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,517mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 605L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,620L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Golf VII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.5 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,584 kg 3,492 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Golf VII Alltrack 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 1,100 km 684 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | VolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 219 km/h 136 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | 1,584 kg 3,492 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,020 km 634 mi | 1,100 km 684 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI | Volkswagen Golf VII Alltrack 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Is 174 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Volkswagen Golf VII Alltrack 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























