Volkswagen Golf VII Variant
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf VII Variant GTD 2.0 TDIvsSkoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf VII Variant GTD 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,042 km647 mi
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,410 kg3,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight130 hp/t97 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,410kg3,109lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,048kg4,515lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 66.5s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 29.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 268Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,020km634mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,575mm180in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,799mm71in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,631mm104in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 131mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 605L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,620L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf VII Variant GTD 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 29.5 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI and Volkswagen Golf VII Variant GTD 2.0 TDI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,020 km 634 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI | SkodaOctavia III Combi2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,410 kg 3,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,020 km 634 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 605 L 21.4 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf VII Variant GTD 2.0 TDI | Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf VII Variant GTD 2.0 TDI
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























