Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,313 kg2,895 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,313kg2,895lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 1,898kg4,184lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 1,476km917mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 847 km 527 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.3 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,313 kg 2,895 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 1,476 km 917 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 629 km (391 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























