Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 2.0 TSIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted232 km/h144 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,528kg3,369lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 1,983kg4,372lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 1,476km917mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,459mm57in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 138mm5in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 109g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 1,528 kg 3,369 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TSI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 232 km/h144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,528 kg 3,369 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 1,476 km 917 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 109 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 7.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,103 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 707 km (439 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























