Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4vsSkoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III · Facelift 2017
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,503 kg3,314 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,567kg3,455lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,973kg4,350lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 32.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,476km917mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 138mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 590L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,580L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 32.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 7.1 s |
Although Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | SkodaOctavia IIIFacelift 20172.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,567 kg 3,455 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,476 km 917 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 | Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 64 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 398 km (247 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Facelift 2017 2.0 TDI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 255 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























