Skoda Octavia II
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSIvsVolkswagen Polo IV (9N) · Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Polo IV (9N) · Facelift 2005
GTI Cup 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range705 km438 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
- Lightest1,095 kg2,414 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t123 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 235Nm173lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,095kg2,414lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 86.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 79.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 29.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 570km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,781cc109cu in |
| Length | 4,578mm180in | 3,916mm154in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,650mm65in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,466mm97in |
| Front track | 1,539mm61in | 1,434mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,426mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,350L | 1,030L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 5,500 rpm | 1,950 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 29.7 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 180 hp 134 kW |
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8 and Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 235 Nm 173 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 1,095 kg 2,414 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI and Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 570 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.3 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia IIRS 2.0 TFSI | VolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 235 Nm 173 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,095 kg 2,414 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 570 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI | Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia II RS 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 45 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range
- Has 290 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Polo IV (9N) Facelift 2005 GTI Cup 1.8
- Is 380 kg lighter
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























