Skoda Karoq Scout
Car comparison
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,696 kg3,739 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,078 km670 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,696kg3,739lb | 1,947kg4,292lb |
| Gross weight | 2,252kg4,965lb | - |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.9s Calculated | 67.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 962km597mi Calculated | 1,078km670mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,398mm173in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,628mm64in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,629mm104in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,576mm62in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,547mm61in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 167mm7in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 479L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,810L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.9 s | 67.8 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 962 km 597 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 1,078 km 670 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKaroq Scout2.0 TDI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb | 1,947 kg 4,292 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 962 km 597 mi | 1,078 km 670 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 479 L 16.9 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Karoq Scout 2.0 TDI
- Is 251 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 117 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























