Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,423 kg3,137 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score52/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 1,423kg3,137lb |
| Gross weight | 2,014kg4,440lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,470L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Seat Leon X-Perience 2.0 TSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 131 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























