Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsBMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
520i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,554 kg3,426 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 290Nm214lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 2,014kg4,440lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 34.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 1,097km682mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,942mm195in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,498mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 141g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,350-4,250 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 34.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 8.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520i: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 1,097 km 682 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 290 Nm 214 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 1,097 km 682 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 141 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 76 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 14 km (9 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520i
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























