Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDIvsBMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW 5 Series Touring (G31)
520d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,554 kg3,426 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score88/100
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,347 km837 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,554kg3,426lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 2,014kg4,440lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 78.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 32.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 1,347km837mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,942mm195in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,498mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,975mm117in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 32.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI and BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 1,347 km 837 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TDI | BMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,554 kg 3,426 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 1,347 km 837 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI | BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TDI
- Is 101 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
BMW 5 Series Touring (G31) 520d
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























