Seat Leon III ST
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDIvsVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC70 II · Facelift 2013
2.4 D5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Best power-to-weight128 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Most powerful215 hp160 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 215hp160kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,919kg4,231lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 80.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 38.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,321km821mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,400cc146cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,838mm190in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,451mm57in | 1,604mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,815mm111in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 575L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,470L | 1,600L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 122g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 38.1 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW |
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has 31 hp more than Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 8.0 s |
Although Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 has more power, Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI and Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 215 hp 160 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III ST2.0 TDI | VolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 215 hp 160 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,919 kg 4,231 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,321 km 821 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 122 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 575 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI | Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST 2.0 TDI
- Is 484 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo XC70 II Facelift 2013 2.4 D5
- Has 31 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























