Seat Leon III SC · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III SC · Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDIvsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Lightest1,210 kg2,668 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions110 g/km
- Best estimated range1,163 km723 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Most powerful152 hp113 kW
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,210kg2,668lb | 1,479kg3,261lb |
| Gross weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.6s Calculated | 52.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,163km723mi Calculated | 1,127km700mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,246mm167in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,599mm102in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 324L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,500L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 110g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.6 s | 52.8 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 has 2 hp more than Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,210 kg 2,668 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 has more power, Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,163 km 723 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 1,127 km 700 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.3 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,210 kg 2,668 lb | 1,479 kg 3,261 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,163 km 723 mi | 1,127 km 700 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 110 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III SC Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 269 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 56 L more trunk volume
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 T3
- Has 2 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























