Seat Leon III SC
Car comparison
Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best estimated range1,111 km690 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,111km690mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,599mm102in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,150L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 119g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI has 4 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 7.4 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
Although Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI has more power, Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III SCFR 2.0 TDI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,111 km 690 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 119 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI | Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III SC FR 2.0 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 116 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 265 km (165 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 31 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 207 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























