Seat Leon III SC
Car comparison
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSIvsSeat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon X-Perience
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful290 hp216 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,300 kg2,866 lb
- Best power-to-weight223 hp/t166 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score89/100
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range846 km526 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 290hp216kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,300kg2,866lb | 1,486kg3,276lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 31.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km464mi Calculated | 846km526mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,543mm179in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,423mm56in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,596mm102in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,503mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 587L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,150L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 5,900-6,400 rpm | 1,700-5,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 31.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 290 hp 216 kW |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI has 110 hp more than Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 5.7 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 746 km 464 mi |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 846 km 526 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 290 hp 216 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III SCCupra 2.0 TSI | SeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 290 hp 216 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,300 kg 2,866 lb | 1,486 kg 3,276 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 464 mi | 846 km 526 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI | Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III SC Cupra 2.0 TSI
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 186 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
- Has 102 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon X-Perience 1.8 TSI
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Has 207 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























