Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4vsSeat Leon III · Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III · Facelift 2016
FR 2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,476 km917 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score95/100
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,503kg3,314lb | 1,295kg2,855lb |
| Gross weight | 2,005kg4,420lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 81.4s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.0s Calculated | 33.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,476km917mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 4,281mm169in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 118g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.0 s | 33.0 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,476 km 917 mi |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,476 km 917 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 118 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 | Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 365 km (227 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 2.0 TDI
- Is 208 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























