Volkswagen Eos
Car comparison
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSIvsSeat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Ibiza IV SC
Cupra 1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Lightest1,184 kg2,610 lb
- Best power-to-weight152 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Largest trunk236 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best estimated range764 km475 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,497kg3,300lb | 1,184kg2,610lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 98.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.9s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 152hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 703km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,407mm174in | 4,063mm160in |
| Width | 1,791mm71in | 1,693mm67in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,420mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,469mm97in |
| Front track | 1,545mm61in | 1,449mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,441mm57in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 205L | 236L |
| Max trunk volume | 380L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 6,200 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.9 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 1,184 kg 2,610 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 7.2 s |
Although Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI has more power, Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI and Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 764 km 475 mi |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 703 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenEos2.0 TSI | SeatIbiza IV SCCupra 1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,497 kg 3,300 lb | 1,184 kg 2,610 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 703 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 205 L 7.2 cu ft | 236 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 152 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI | Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Eos 2.0 TSI
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Ibiza IV SC Cupra 1.4 TSI
- Is 313 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























