Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5vsSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,478 kg3,258 lb
- Best power-to-weight156 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk422 L
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,478kg3,258lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 71.4s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,454mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 422L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 4,600-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 19 hp more than Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,478 kg 3,258 lb |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.2 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 604 km 375 mi |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.3 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | SeatExeo STFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,478 kg 3,258 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 422 L 14.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 | Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 19 hp more
- Is 12 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Exeo ST Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 396 km (246 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 67 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























